Category: Uncategorized

  • Should Your Board Hire a Search Firm or Conduct the Superintendent Search Itself?

    When a superintendent announces a departure, one of the first questions a board asks is whether it really needs to hire a search firm. The district has an HR department that hires people all year long. Why not let them handle it?

    It’s a fair question, and the answer isn’t always that you need outside help. But after years of leading districts and running HR departments ourselves, we’ve seen how often an in-house search creates problems the board didn’t anticipate.

    A Superintendent Search Isn’t a Normal Hire

    Your HR department is good at what it does. It fills teaching positions, posts openings, checks credentials, and onboards new staff. A superintendent search is a different kind of work. It involves recruiting sitting leaders who aren’t looking for a job, managing a public process under open meeting law, gathering input from the whole community, and guiding a board through one of the most important decisions it will make.

    Most boards go through a superintendent search only once every several years, and most HR departments rarely do one at all. A search firm does this work all the time.

    It Puts Real Strain on the Department

    A search adds hundreds of hours to a department that is already busy. Someone has to answer candidate questions, schedule interviews, organize forums, coordinate with every board member, and keep the process on schedule. That work comes on top of the department’s normal responsibilities, often during the spring hiring season, when HR is already stretched thin. Something usually gives, and it’s often the search, the regular work, or both.

    Internal Candidates Create a Conflict

    This is the issue boards most often overlook. When internal candidates apply, your HR staff may be screening their own supervisor, a close colleague, or someone they’ll report to next year. Sometimes the HR director is a candidate.

    Even when everyone acts with complete integrity, the arrangement puts staff in an uncomfortable spot. Candidates may wonder whether they were treated fairly, and so may the staff and community watching the process.

    Perception Matters as Much as Fairness

    In a public search, it isn’t enough for the process to be fair. People have to believe it was fair. If the board selects an internal candidate after a search run by district staff, critics may say the outcome was decided before it began. If the board passes over a popular internal candidate, supporters may say the process was stacked against them.

    An outside firm gives the board a clear, documented, impartial process. When questions come up, and they usually do, the board can point to how the search was run.

    Confidential conversations, and candid ones

    Strong candidates are often cautious. A sitting superintendent or assistant superintendent may be interested in your district but unwilling to risk their current position if word gets out that they’re looking.

    A search firm can protect those candidates through most of the process. We receive the applications, conduct the initial screening, and interview every candidate who meets the board’s minimum qualifications. Throughout that work, candidates’ names stay confidential. They become public only when the board selects its finalists and the process moves into public view under the open meeting law. Knowing their names won’t be released unless they become finalists encourages strong leaders to apply who otherwise might not. Public records rules vary by state, and we’ll walk your board through what applies in yours.

    Confidentiality also allows for candor. Sometimes, as we learn more about a candidate during screening, it becomes clear they aren’t the right fit for what the district needs. When that happens, we can tell them privately and respectfully. The candidate can withdraw without a public rejection on their record, and the board avoids an awkward situation. That conversation is much harder when it comes from district staff, and harder still when the candidate works in the district.

    Even Internal Searches Benefit

    Some boards decide to consider only internal candidates. That can be a smart choice, and it’s also the kind of search where an outside firm can help the most.

    When several internal candidates are competing for the job, the people who aren’t selected will keep working in the district. An outside firm can make sure every candidate gets the same questions, the same opportunities, and the same consideration, which helps protect working relationships after the decision. It also gives the community confidence that the board looked carefully, even when the choice was close to home.

    Other Things a Search Firm Brings

    A wider pool. Many strong candidates won’t respond to a job posting. A firm with professional networks can reach leaders who aren’t actively looking.

    Experience with the public process. Knowing when a search must be public, and what can stay private, helps the board avoid mistakes that could undermine the outcome.

    Thorough vetting. Reference checks and background research on executive candidates take time and experience to do well.

    A neutral voice for the board. When trustees disagree about what the district needs, an outside facilitator can help them find common ground without anyone feeling outmaneuvered.

    Help with the contract. Negotiating a superintendent’s contract is a specialized task, and having guidance from people who have been on both sides of the table helps.

    When a Board Might Do It Alone

    To be fair, there are situations where a board may not need a firm. If the board is united, there’s a strong internal successor with broad community support, and no other internal candidates are in the picture, a simple in-house process may work. Even then, it’s worth considering whether outside guidance on parts of the process, such as community input or contract development, would help.

    Making the Decision

    Hiring a search firm is an investment, and boards are right to weigh the cost. We built our pricing around the realities of public budgets, so smaller districts and simpler searches cost less. Read more about how we price searches.

    If your board is starting to think about a transition, schedule a conversation. We’re glad to talk through your situation, even if the answer is that you can handle it yourselves.

  • What Does a Superintendent Search Cost?

    It’s usually one of the first questions a board asks, and it should be. A superintendent search is a significant expense for any district, and for a small district it can feel out of reach.

    We spent our careers in public education, managing tight budgets and answering to taxpayers for every dollar. When we built our pricing, we wanted it to reflect that experience. So instead of charging every district the same flat fee, we start with a base rate and let the board shape the final cost through the choices it makes about the search.

    What affects the cost

    The size of the district. A search for a district of 400 students involves less work than a search for a district of 20,000. There are fewer stakeholder groups to hear from, fewer applicants to screen, and a smaller community to engage. Smaller districts pay less because the volume of work is smaller.

    Internal or internal and external. Some boards want to look first at leaders already in the district. Others want to open the search to candidates from anywhere. A combined internal and external search takes more recruiting, outreach, and screening, so it costs more. An internal search can be a sound and less expensive choice when the district already has strong leaders ready to step up.

    The level of stakeholder engagement. Every search we conduct includes one-on-one meetings with each board member. Beyond that, the board decides how much input it wants from staff, parents, students, and the community. Some boards want surveys and several public forums. Others prefer a simpler approach. More engagement takes more time, and the cost reflects that.

    Advertising at actual cost

    The board decides how much to spend on advertising the position, whether that means a few targeted postings or a broader national campaign. We bill the district only what the advertising actually costs. We don’t add an administrative fee or a markup.

    A hybrid approach to travel

    We’ve found that much of a search can be done well remotely. We hold our one-on-one board member meetings over Zoom, which also makes them easier to schedule around trustees’ jobs and families. Candidate screening interviews, reference checks, surveys, and regular check-ins with the board chair work well remotely, too.

    Some parts of a search need us in the room. We come to the district for community and staff forums, board interviews, and finalist visits. Those are the moments when relationships are built and impressions are formed, and they deserve a personal touch.

    This approach keeps travel costs down for the district without making the search feel distant.

    The board designs the search

    There’s no single right way to conduct a superintendent search. A board that knows its community well may want a lean, focused process. A board facing a divided community may want extensive engagement. We’ll walk through the options with you, explain how each choice affects the scope of work and the cost, and help you design a search that fits both your needs and your budget.

    Schedule a conversation to talk about what a search would look like for your district.